Byju’s rejects creditors' allegations, says invested $500 mn in debt instruments
Advertisement

Byju’s rejects creditors' allegations, says invested $500 mn in debt instruments

Byju’s rejects creditors' allegations, says invested $500 mn in debt instruments
Byju Raveendran, founder and CEO, Byju's

Byju’s on Wednesday disclosed that it invested more than $500 million in debt instruments, responding to investor concerns after American lenders alleged that the online tutor deliberately hid money in an obscure hedge fund.

Glas Trust Co., the trustee representing lenders who had extended a loan of $1.2 billion to the world’s most valuable education technology startup in November 2021, told a Florida court on 7 September that Byju’s transferred $533 million to Camshaft Capital Fund, a Miami-based hedge fund, allegedly established by a 23-year-old with no training or experience in investing. The lenders also told the court that the official address of the hedge fund in its regulatory filings is a US restaurant chain, IHOP.

Bloomberg reported on Glas Trust’s filing against Camshaft on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Glas Trust is also involved in a legal case against two of Byju’s US entities in a New York court as it seeks to recover outstanding funds.

However, Byju’s denied any wrongdoing and clarified that it is the “beneficiary owner of the funds”.

“As a commercially prudent borrower and like any large corporate treasury, Byju’s Alpha made investments in a multi-hundred billion dollar fund with high-security fixed income instruments,” a Byju’s spokesperson said.

Advertisement

“Our credit agreement with lenders does not prohibit or restrict the movement or investment of monies disbursed. There is no requirement for Byju’s to maintain cash as collateral. As a matter of fact, the Delaware court ruling in June this year rejected the lenders’ application for information in relation to the amount in question, i.e. part of the funds received by Byju’s Alpha, the borrowing entity under the TLB (term loan B).”

The management also spoke to several investors, providing them with details of the transactions and the location of the funds. “Camshaft was used as a wealth adviser,” a person in the know on the matter said, adding that the $533 million was moved to a reputable asset manager through Camshaft.

At the heart of the dispute is the repayment of the $1.2 billion loan availed by Byju’s in November 2021. Now, the lenders have requested the firm to repay the amount following allegations of breaching certain covenants.

Advertisement

Lenders have argued that Byju’s intentionally evaded them by moving the $533 million in mid-2022, which they believed would be available for debt servicing of the $1.2 billion loan.

Byju’s stopped servicing the loan in June, citing predatory tactics by the lenders and the ongoing litigation.

While Byju’s lenders want immediate access to the money, the edtech major has proposed a six-month repayment schedule with $300 million to be paid within 75 days.

Advertisement

Both parties are also pursuing out-of-court negotiations.

Despite the ongoing efforts for a mutual settlement, in court filings, lenders have alleged that Byju’s went “to great lengths to conceal the whereabouts” of the $533 million in its legal responses.

“In response to the exercise of remedies by the lenders, Byju’s eponymous founder and CEO Byju Raveendran brazenly claimed “the money is someplace the lenders will never find”. In an earlier litigation filed in Delaware, the borrower’s counsel admitted in open court that it moved the funds to remove them from the reach of lenders “based on fear of lenders acting expeditiously”, said a 7 September court filing seen by Mint.

Advertisement

Share article on

Advertisement
Advertisement