Australia's largest pension fund, AustralianSuper, is preparing for the end of the global equities run and looking to infrastructure opportunities in the United States where it believes foreign firms will in time gain greater access.

AustralianSuper is a A$120 billion ($96.6 billion) fund that seeks out major positions, chief executive Ian Silk said at a Reuters Newsmaker event on Thursday in Sydney, that can affect its burgeoning book.

"The risks are principally in equity markets and for Australian super funds equity markets really determine the bulk of the absolute returns," Silk told Reuters in an interview after the event.

Just over half of AustralianSuper's most popular 'balanced' fund is invested in Australian and global equities, according to the fund's website.

It has more than doubled its cash holdings over the 12 months to June 30, from 3.8 percent to 8.8 percent, with cuts to property, private equity and international equity exposure.

"We are not finding too many asset classes great value at the moment," Silk said at the event.

While AustralianSuper recently purchased the country's biggest electricity grid with partner IFM Investors, the fund believes there are few suitable-sized local infrastructure investment plays left for a manager fueled by net cash inflows of around A$500 million per month from members.

Silk said that U.S. President Donald Trump's $1 trillion infrastructure plan represented an opportunity even if it was unclear if and how the plan would operate. He felt that any concerns against foreign investment in the United States would be overcome by its immense need to improve its infrastructure.

"When push comes to shove, they'll balance the parochialism with the party who is prepared to write the biggest check," said Silk.

"Dog's Breakfast" Energy Policy

In a quest to reduce fees and improve returns, AustralianSuper is building its internal management capability, as opposed to only awarding mandates to external managers.

Silk said the fund currently managed about 23 percent of its A$120 billion-odd assets internally.

"We are budgeting for a reduction in our investment costs," said Silk, referring to fee savings by hiring in-house teams.

The internalization model has had mixed results in other markets, with skeptics citing onerous risk and compliance systems which, combined with staff retention incentives, dent the expected net returns.

The fund's internal managers won't, however, likely invest in Australian energy assets until there was a coherent energy policy, Silk said.

Australia has been subject to a decade of political fights over climate policy, where the future contribution of coal-fired power generation and renewable energy is unclear.

"The energy market at the moment, to use a colloquial term, is a dog's breakfast," said Silk. "It's not a regime that is inviting for investors."

Talent issue dissuades fund from adding direct PE biz

Australia's largest pension fund, AustralianSuper, aims to expand its in-house management of equities and infrastructure investments, but has no plans to include private equity managers, Chief Executive Ian Silk said on Thursday.

AustralianSuper plans to manage half of its A$120 billion ($96.7 billion) equities, fixed income, infrastructure and property portfolios in-house within five years, doubling from the current 23 percent, rather than relying on external managers.

"The asset class that we haven't invested in to date and is not immediately on the horizon in large-scale investing is private equity," Silk said at a Reuters Newsmaker event in Sydney, citing the difficulty of recruiting and retaining staff in that area.

AustralianSuper is a big supporter of so-called "internalisation of investments" and Silk said the fund would not eventually spin off its growing internal investment arm, as some funds have done abroad.

The conundrum of whether and how pension funds can attract portfolio managers has split the industry, which manages a pool of A$2.1 trillion ($1.7 trillion) tax-advantaged retirement savings.

Silk said the move was already paying dividends, with in-house management proving they can outperform external fund managers as well as find savings on fees.

"There's no point in saving cents on the fees you pay but losing dollars on the returns," Silk said. "It's got to be a net returning outcome, not just reduced fees."

"Last year our assets went up by about 18 percent and our investment costs went up about 2 percent."

Critics of internalisation say projected savings are exaggerated and point out that in Canada, one of the early adopters of internalisation, funds found themselves paying high salaries in order to attract top talent.

Leave Your Comment(s)