| Log in
Satyam Kumar, Executive Director, Loantap Financial

Regulation is the need of the hour for P2P startups

24 March, 2017

A major issue affecting any nascent industry is regulation. There are pros and cons: Though regulation seems to stifle innovation, unbridled organisations may cause more harm than good to the society.

When discussing peer-to-peer lending (P2P) in the context of regulation, we need to first understand how startups in this domain function. P2P lending firms offer an online platform to connect people who need money with potential lenders. Generally, this model is structured in a way that the borrower can choose from lenders offering different rates and tenures. In the process, the P2P platform generally charges a fee to both the borrower and the lender, thus generating revenue for itself.

Globally, four kinds of regulatory scenarios play out in different countries. First, P2P lending in countries like China, South Korea and Egypt is not regulated. In fact, China has emerged as one of the biggest P2P markets in the world. Second, in countries like Israel and Japan, P2P lending is banned under legislation. Third, in countries like France, Italy and Germany, P2P platforms are partially or completely regulated. Fourth, in the United States, each state has its own set of regulations for P2P lending. While a state like Texas bans such platforms, most other states permit it.

For lenders, P2P platforms are a channel to safeguard their money. However, with more than 40 P2P online platforms available, lenders cannot differentiate among the many players, since anyone can start such a platform. A system of basic checks for operators of P2P platforms would weed out unscrupulous elements.

A concern for borrowers is to ensure that their personal information remains confidential. In unregulated P2P markets like China, there have been serious breaches of personal data by the loan sharks.
Regulation would give genuine P2P players more credibility. The Reserve Bank of India had last year published a consultation paper that sought to regulate P2P firms in line with non-banking finance companies. This would give P2P platforms much-needed access to the databases of credit information bureaus like CIBIL, Crif Highmark, Experian and Equifax. A proper credit worthiness check of the borrower would put lenders at ease and would lead to more business.

Thus, a regulated P2P space would provide easy and transparent access to loans to those sections of society that are not being served by the conventional banking sector.

Satyam Kumar is founder and executive director of online lending startup LoanTap. The firm offers EMI-free loans and overdraft products to salaried professionals.

Like this column? Sign up for our daily newsletter to get our top reports.

 


Leave Your Comment
Proposed norms for P2P lending: A setback for cash-poor but promising startups?

Proposed norms for P2P lending: A setback for cash-poor but promising startups?

Archana Khosla 2 years ago
“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be...
Here’s why RBI wants to regulate online P2P lending

Here’s why RBI wants to regulate online P2P lending

Aman Malik 2 months ago
Last week, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said it is set to bring peer-to-peer ...
RBI’s P2P lending norms: A step backward or forward?

RBI’s P2P lending norms: A step backward or forward?

Aman Malik 4 weeks ago
Just when peer-to-peer lending in India was gaining traction, the Reserve Bank...
No Comments

Regulation is the need of the hour for P2P startups

Powered by WordPress.com VIP