How Budget 2012 Affects Taxation Of Overseas Transfer

19 March, 2012

The current tax law provides for deeming provisions by virtue of which it creates a legal fiction and enables to tax income whether or not arising in India. One of such situation covered under the current tax law is income arising or accruing directly or indirectly through transfer of capital asset situate in India.

This was inter-alia the central point of dispute in Vodafone case which ultimately involved Honorable Supreme Court to resolve the controversy. It was argued by Vodafone that overseas transfer of shares of a foreign company does not fall within the ambit of aforesaid deeming fiction and consequently not be subject to tax in India. Honorable Supreme Court held that (based on the facts) the aforesaid deeming section cannot be extended to cover indirect transfer of capital assets or property situated in India, giving a huge relief to Vodafone and other international investors and a huge blow to revenue authorities.

However, the bliss conferred to international investors by the Supreme Court was short-lived as the Finance Bill, 2012 (‘the Bill’) seeks to re-open the controversy surrounding taxation in India of overseas transfers.  The Bill proposes to amend the deeming fiction to provide for taxation of overseas transfer of shares or interest of an overseas entity deriving substantial value from Indian assets (directly or indirectly). So much so the aforesaid changes are retrospective and have been brought by way of an explanation which essentially means that such overseas transfers were always subject to tax in India.

Incidentally, the proposed Direct Taxes Code, 2010 (‘DTC’) also proposes to tax transfers outside India of shares in a foreign company in proportion to fair market value of assets located in India, where fair market value of assets in India exceeds 50 per cent of the value of all assets owned by such foreign company.

Further, Bill proposes to specify certain transactions which would be subject to withholding tax obligations irrespective of the fact whether or not such transactions are taxable in India.

The proposed amendments are outrageous and if enacted, would impact numerous cross border transactions as all transactions involving overseas transfers where there the value is substantially derived from Indian assets would get impacted. Offshore private equity funds, which either wholly or substantially focus on India investments, would most certainly be impacted as any overseas exit by the Fund or the investors of the Fund would become taxable in India subject to tax treaty benefits. Given the retrospective amendment, it may re-open the settled cases too and cases which were hoping to rely on Honorable Supreme Court decision in Vodafone case.

The aforesaid amendment is bound to adversely impact investor sentiments. One would have to wait and watch whether the intention of the Finance Ministry sees the light of day.

(Punit Shah is Partner, KPMG and Heads Tax & Regulatory Services for Private Equity/Venture Capital Funds)


View Comments
The Vodafone - Hutchison Case And Its Implications

The Vodafone – Hutchison Case And Its Implications

SHANTANU SURPURE 9 years ago
The tax season just ended in India with the end of the year tax assessments on September 30 and many companies were busy with their...
Budget: What could have been done

Budget: What could have been done

Nishith Desai 4 years ago
Offshore Transfers: The most prominent of these has been the non-consideration of the retrospective indirect transfer provisions which were introduced by the previous year’s Finance...
Two Legal Viewpoints On The Vodafone Tax Case

Two Legal Viewpoints On The Vodafone Tax Case

TEAM VCC 9 years ago
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition by the Britain-based global mobile giant Vodafone challenging a $1.7-billion tax notice served on the company...
1 Comment
Rdoshi . 5 years ago

It is indeed disturbing to see the thought process of the Revenue on taxing such transactions as Vodafone. While there could be a merit in the argument that one should pay taxes in India if the gains are largely arising out of Indian operations, to try and achieve the objective in a retrospective manner when the highest court in the land has already delivered its judgement is reprehensible.

The proposed amendment would in all probability be challenged under the international treaty conventions and it would be interesting to see what the indian government believes is the way to prove that taxation of such transactions was always contemplated in law. A moot point here is also whether other countries would join as parties affected by this proposed amendment.

How Budget 2012 Affects Taxation Of Overseas Transfer

Powered by WordPress.com VIP