Your Name:
Your Email Address:
Friend's Name:
Friend's Email Address:
  
Columnist Image

VCs Look At Team & Scale In Startups.

The Venture Capital decision-making process is often perceived as enigmatic and complicated because less than 1-2% of the plans received get funded.

A Venture Capitalist, a subset of the investor group, is equally driven to earn a proportionate return on the risk taken. To that extent, this investor class is no different.

In early-stage investing, VCs look at two things: The team and the forces that affect the growth of the business.

For almost all investors, the team’s abilities are of more consequence than the business itself. Every business, no matter what industry, will face tough times and it is the difference in response to such situations that separates success from failure. This is all the more true for early stage investments because the company is in a fledgling state and requires appropriate leadership to help it mature.

Therefore, an investor, through his interaction with the promoters tries to identify whether the person has a ‘can-do’ attitude to meet the rigors of entrepreneurship. In the first meeting itself, the investor tries to ascertain whether the entrepreneur can execute the business plan effectively and be a motivated and inspiring leader.

An investor also looks for someone who is likeable and easy to work with – after all, for the duration of the investment the investor is ‘married’ to the entrepreneur.

I recently met two companies vying for the same market. They were both founded couple of years ago, and were generating approximately similar revenues. While one promoter’s vision was to achieve $20 million in revenues in 5 years, the other targeted to achieve $100 million in the same time frame. The difference in approach and motivation was very clear from the actions each had taken to lay the foundation of their businesses, and the way each of them described his plan.

The more aggressive promoter surrounded himself with experienced and knowledgeable people, approached the business from the point of view of creating a world class enterprise and paid attention to processes that would help make the business scalable in the long term – and all this was evident in the first meeting itself. 

Moving on to the next piece - the business itself - the first thought in an Investor’s mind is ‘How big can this become?’

A typical early stage Investor will take a positive call if the business holds a potential of ten-fold growth over 5-6 years. While this may seem excessive to an onlooker, factoring in contingencies and risks, this return expectation is par for the course.

Investors will typically study the following primary factors before making their decision:

·     Proof of concept: Validation from current customers and sales pipeline

·     Scalability: The size of the market that is targeted by the company should justify that there is enough demand for its products and services.

·     ‘Defensibility’: The Investor keenly assesses the impact of current and future competition on the company’s growth.

·     Exit: The end goal of all investors. Ideally, they would prefer taking the company public for the most independent exit.

We have come across several prospects where promoters believe they are showing scalability by forecasting growth from $1-2 million in revenue to about $30 million over 5 years. While this is rapid growth, such growth is realised only if everything falls as per business plan. Unfortunately, the course of an entrepreneurial journey is very uncertain and execution can falter. So, if after about five years of staying invested, the company reaches only $14-15 million in size, not only does it unfavorably skew the risk-reward ratio, but also, closes the IPO route for an exit.

For a company that has achieved about $14-15 million in revenues in 6-7 years of operation, it is difficult, although not impossible, to find a business that would acquire it at a good price, and even more unrealistic that the promoters would buy-back the Investor’s shares. For this reason, it is very important for entrepreneurs to think early on about how their business can achieve a significant enough size in 5-6 years that it can either go public or find several suitors. 

So, all these factors have to align favourably for an investor to give a go-ahead. Given the grey areas in the investment decision, very often the investor’s instinct or gut feeling comes into play.

Comments

Prasun,

One thing need to be kept in mind that nowadays it has become very difficult to do well in IPO until you show a healthy revenue growth and scalable business model in first five years. For example - all IPO's are being rated by CRISIL and they give a rating evaluating all aspects. Recently they gave rating of 2/5 to Infinite solutions on basis of poor revenue growth compare to peers.This results in poor IPO response from public and institutions .
Bottomline is that you should not only strike around 20million + in first four years but also demonstarte a growth oriented , profitable and scalable business model.
If you don't do well on these parameters external as well as internal forces (motivation level of senior team & investor) will bring things down.

samudra sen,

from an enterprenurial perspective in india, one really looks for not diluting too much equity. one key factor that determines the scalability of the business is also the capitalization requirements and if as an enterprenuer I can access cheap capital i can certainly push growth much harder. here in the comparison made between the two enterprenuers, one would love to understand how much money each one asked and what they were willing to dilute in return....something that is key to the psyche of the indian enterprenuer make up...in the US you would rather capitalize very well and build a $100mn business than a under capitalize and build a $15mn business....an example is Educomp...when it went IPO it was in the $20mn range and look where it is today...and there are numerous such examples...so I could not quite agree with the premise that an IPO in India cannot be done at that number...the threshold here is much lower than in the US or other developed markets...the key is how the IPO is percieved and sold.

Amitabh Nagpal ,

India is a very differant market where $16 million revenue in the 5 th year is tangible business. If you manage to create a $15 million business in 5 years - you will figure out creating a $100 million in the next 5 years Remember one will become a $16 million company before you become a $30 million company .
Try cross $10m with a single focus ..of sales and strong product ... in a three/four year horizon .

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


Indepth
The judiciary has yet again recognized the principles laid down in Azadi Bachao Andolan’s case.
The addition of distressed assets to a Fund Manager’s portfolio must compensate for the risks associated with it.
Interviews
Harshal Shah talks about RTVL’s new sector focus, performance of portfolio firms and exit strategy for Yatra.com.
Bala Deshpande of NEA feels that risk factors have become more addressable in the current phase of dealmaking.